Home > SRC: Who Is The Raiden Of The 21st Century? > Sheathing The Sword! SENGOKU X

Sheathing The Sword! SENGOKU X

raiden
Another SENGOKU event in the books and it turned out good excitement wise despite a small crowd.

As you might already know SENGOKU will change name to Sengoku Raiden Championship (Raiden means thunder (rai) and lightning (den)) and their New Years Event will take place on NYE at the Ariake Colosseum with Satoshi Ishii vs. Hidehiko Yoshida as the main event.

The story behind the new event name comes from the man Raiden Tameemon (1767-1825) who is considered to be one of the greatest sumo wrestlers (sumo record: 254-10-41) of all time.

Raiden was born to a farming family in a village in rural Shinano province. He is said to have possessed great physical strength even in childhood. His father Hanemon, who enjoyed sumo as much as sake, allowed 14 year old Raiden to attend sumo classes at Nagaze (today called Murokocho), the neighbouring village.

When Raiden was 17, the Urakaze-beya stablemaster noticed him when he came through the area while on jungyo with his wrestlers. He was especially impressed with the young man’s physique, which was extraordinary at the time. Young Raiden was 1.97 metres (6’5.5″) tall, which was three headlengths taller than most of his contemporaries. He also had matching long arms and large hands; a handprint at the Shofukuji temple near Okayama, which is said to be of Raiden’s hand, measures 24 cm (9.5″) from the wrist to the tip of the middle finger.

Between November 1793 and April 1800, Raiden won all tournaments he participated in, without leaving even one title to the other great fighters of his time, Tanikaze and Onogawa. After 1800, he remained dominant, and sumo officials even disallowed him to use his favourite techniques in order to keep his matches interesting.

Despite his dominance, he never was promoted to Yokozuna, the highest title in sumo. The reason remains a mystery in the history of sumo. – Wikipedia

The theme of the new name is: “Who is the Raiden of the 21st century?”

Another reason for the name change is that SENGOKU’s official name was written with Chinese characters (戦極) before. Now it’s written in European writing, so it will be easier for the foreign fans when SENGOKU/SRC advance overseas.

At the post-event press conference, WVR PR Kokuho said: “I can’t announce it at the present time.” about a future TV broadcast.

Nansen provoked Ishii post-event by saying that he wants to fight him next. Receiving this, Ishii said if SENGOKU puts it together he’ll do it. However, he said that he’ll feel sorry for Nansen because he’ll pin him down and end it without fail. Ishii also said: “I won’t lose to Masato.”

Hiroshi Izumi admitted after his debut that he was obsessed with striking leading into the fight. From now on he’ll build his own style and he also said that this kind of fist fight is already plenty enough, you’ll see an attack, throw, and win style from now on. Also, Izumi is suspended for 60 days due to the KO loss.

Akihiro Gono, Michihiro Omigawa vs. Hatsu Hioki, and Yuji Hoshino vs. Marlon Sandro have been added to SENGOKU XI in November.

At a press conference on the 24th, Hoshino’s SENGOKU participation was officially announced. WVR PR Kokuho said that they offered Hoshino a spot in the GP. He couldn’t participate however due to injury and family circumstances (marriage, etc.).

Hoshino thinks that there are many great fighters in SENGOKU’s FW division after seeing the GP. He himself wants to display good fights and liven up SENGOKU. Hoshino thinks that his break has been a good refresh for him. He had many injuries previously which he has now received treatment on so he’ll appear in the Sandro fight in his best condition.

WVR PR Kokuho said that they are looking to make Kazunori Yokota vs. Eiji Mitsuoka for November, Gono has requested a strong opponent for his return, and Jorge Santiago’s opponent will be Joe Doerksen or another idea that they currently thinking about. Kokuho also wants Satoru Kitaoka to fight in November.

They want to hold three title fights on NYE. At Featherweight, Lightweight, and Welterweight. The current plan is to crown a Light Heavyweight and a Heavyweght champion next year.

Kokuho ended the press conference with an advance notice of a surprise, saying that he thinks it’ll be good if they’re able to do something surprising which will be the first of it’s kind in Japan.

Advertisements
  1. whomever
    September 24, 2009 at 9:43 pm

    Sounds like Sengoku are trying to make Barnett/Silva happen next year then.

  2. gjs
    September 25, 2009 at 2:15 am

    Sengoku matchmaking for title fights isn’t good. They should do Yokota-Hirota next. If they do Mitsuoka-Yokota now they are killing off what could be a future title match & if Gomi’s gone, they don’t have many contenders. Plus, Yokota’s highly unlikely to win inside the distance, so the interest in him challenging will be reduced.

    Hioki should be fighting Kanehara. Their 1st fight was awesome & the way Hioki faded in the 3rd makes a 5 round fight look so intriguing. Omigawa should fight the Korean Zombie to find a challenger for the Kanehara-Hioki winner.

    I’ve got a couple of questions regarding the show. What was the official finish in the Maximo Blanco fight? Sherdog said it was a verbal tap out, but other places say it was a ref stoppage.

    Also, what’s with the bald ref? He warned Joe for a lack of action while he was passing to half guard & then stood him up as soon as he got to mount.

    Sengoku needs to look at their officiating. If guys are on the ground like in the Yokota fight & last shows Hirota fight, the refs shouldn’t stand them up, so they can issue cautions for holding the ropes. They should wait until there’s a break in the action & then give the caution. It’s so unfair to the guy spending the energy to get a takedown, to get stood up straight away.

  3. CSKit
    September 25, 2009 at 5:39 am

    I’d rather see Hioki vs Jung for #1 contender.

    Sherdog says the Maxi vs Yamada fight is TKO(Punches).

    I don’t mind them stopping the action immediately for grabbing ropes IF they are going to give a Yellow card or Point Deduction, not just a warning.

  4. CSKit
    September 25, 2009 at 5:39 am

    This was in response to gjs’ post

  5. gjs
    September 25, 2009 at 5:48 am

    An immediate stoppage while they’re standing is fine. I think there was 1 in the Jim York fight, but I don’t really remember. If it goes to the ground, they shouldn’t stand them back up just because the guy held the ropes before he went down.

  6. September 25, 2009 at 5:57 am

    official result: TKO referee stoppage.

    Bald ref is an idiot for standing them up at that time.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: